[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.93 Brooke Astor, ‘‘Weighing the Benefits,’’ Vanity Fair, October 1995, 156.94 Robert Lenzner, ‘‘The Mouth of the South Puts His Foot In It,’’Forbes, October 14, 1996, 40–41.For more about ‘‘the mouth ofthe south,’’ see Ken Auletta’s Media Man: Ted Turner’s ImprobableEmpire.95 ‘‘The Fine Art of Giving,’’ Time, December 16, 1996, 48–49.96 Robert X.Cringely, ‘‘High-tech Wealth,’’ Forbes, July 7, 1997, 308.97 Katie Hafner, ‘‘The Wealth and Avarice of the Cyberrich,’’ Newsweek, December 30, 1996– January 6, 1997, 48–51.98 Michael Lewis, ‘‘What Will Gates Give?’’ New York Times, October 13, 1996, SM34.99 ‘‘Bill Gates,’’ People, December 31, 1999, 75.100 Adam Cohen, ‘‘Putting His Mouth.’’ Time, September 29, 1997, 32.101 Howard Fineman, ‘‘Why Ted Gave It Away,’’ Newsweek, September 29, 1997, 29–32.102 Stephen Glass, ‘‘Gift of the Magnate,’’ the New Republic, January 26, 1998, 16–19.103 ‘‘A New Breed of Philanthropist,’’ BusinessWeek, October 6, 1997, 40–44.104 James Traub, ‘‘Philanthropy 101,’’ the New Yorker, October 20–27, 1997, 33–34.105 Michael Lewis, ‘‘Heartless Donors,’’ New York Times, December 14, 1997, 231.106 Jonathan Alter, ‘‘The Nicer Nineties,’’ Newsweek, December 29, 1997–January 5, 1998, 44–45).107 Anne Faircloth and Caroline Bollinger, ‘‘Fortune’s 40 Most Generous Americans,’’ Fortune, February 2, 1998, 88.NOTES295108 ‘‘The Billionaire Next Door.’’109 David Whelan, ‘‘Who Gives?’’ Forbes, October 11, 2004, 76.110 Carol J.Loomis, ‘‘Warren Buffett Gives Away His Fortune,’’ Fortune, June 25, 2006, (online edition).111 Jane Lampman, ‘‘Rich to the Rescue,’’ the Christian Science Monitor, November 20, 2006, 13.112 Dave Denison, ‘‘Watching the Rich Give,’’ New York Times, March 9, 2008, SM14.113 Jon Gertner, ‘‘For Good Measure,’’ New York Times, March 9, 2008, SM66Ⳮ; Abby Aguirre, ‘‘Easy Come, Easy Go for Idealistic Heirs,’’New York Times, March 9, 2008, ST11.114 Louis Uchitelle, ‘‘The Richest of the Rich, Proud of a New Gilded Age,’’ New York Times, July 15, 2007, 1.Conclusion1 Geraldine Fabrikant, ‘‘They’re Pinching Hundred-Dollar Bills,’’ New York Times, October 4, 2008, 1.2 Ellen Gamerman, Cheryl Lu-Lien Tan, and Francine Schwadel, ‘‘As Times Turn Tough, New York’s Wealthy Economize,’’ WSJ.com,September 20, 2008.3 ‘‘Russia’s Wealthy Hit Hard By Financial Turmoil,’’ Morning Edition, October 15, 2008.4 Christine Haughney, ‘‘In Tough Times, Even the BillionairesWorry,’’ New York Times, September 10, 2008, 2L.5 Tim Arango and Julie Creswell, ‘‘Goodbye To All That,’’ New York Times, October 5, 2008, BU1Ⳮ.6 Tom Herman, ‘‘There’s Rich, and There’s the ‘Fortunate 400,’ ’’Wall Street Journal, March 5, 2008, D1.This page intentionally left blankBIBLIOGRAPHYAuthor’s NoteRich relies primarily on period magazines and newspapers as its sources of material, because I believe journalists serving on thefront lines of the scene represent our most valuable resource forrecovering unfiltered stories of the wealthy.From these hundredsof journalists’ reports from the field, many of them obscure andlargely forgotten but important firsthand accounts of the goings-onwithin the lives of the day’s rich, we really do get the first draft ofhistory.Other books about the American rich have also been a valuableresource and may be of interest to the reader.Our literary land-scape has in fact been littered with attempts to, as recently ex-pressed, decode ‘‘the millionaire mind.’’ A virtual flood of booksabout the robber barons of the Gilded Age was written in the twen-ties and thirties, almost all harshly and deservingly critical of these298BIBLIOGRAPHYmen who turned the term ‘‘rich’’ into a four-letter word.‘‘In anyconsiderable library of Americana the bibliography devoted to thedefamation of rich men is ample,’’ thought Lucius Beebe in 1962;he was of the opinion that besides approved (or paid for) biograph-ies, ‘‘the well-to-do in the United States have had an uncommonlybad press.’’ Cleveland Amory’s The Last Resorts of 1952 lookednostalgically back on the golden age of Saratoga, Bar Harbor, Tux-edo Park, Southampton, Palm Beach, and Newport at the turn ofthe century (these resorts catering specifically to ‘‘any millionairelooking for the shortest distance between the cash register and thesocial register,’’ as Time put it in its review of the book), and in his 1960 Who Killed Society? Amory traced how the nouveau riche evolved into the Old Guard.Other books about the rich in thepostwar years, notably Robert Heilbroner’s 1956 The Quest forWealth and Lucy Kavaler’s The Private World of High Society of 1960, focused on the human drive for acquisition and, specifically,Americans’ common desire to rise to a higher social class duringsome particularly money-oriented times.As well, classic sociologi-cal works like C.Wright Mills’s 1956 The Power Elite, WilliamWhyte’s The Organization Man of the same year, John KennethGalbraith’s 1958 The Affluent Society, and Vance Packard’s The Status Seekers of the following year each explored different dimensions of the wealthy elite as it blossomed during the postwar years.In the sixties and seventies, as the cult of celebrity emerged,books about the American rich tended to go for sheer shock value.Revisionist historians in the early 1960s helped to restore in partthe reputation of men like Henry Ford and John D.Rockefeller,however, tranforming them into something between the ogres theyhad been popularly viewed as and actual human beings.FerdinandLundberg’s 1968 bestseller The Rich and the Super-Rich made quite a sensation with its argument that a very small number of households effectively controlled the nation through their economic andsocial power.Kenneth Lamott’s The Money Makers of the following year showed readers that some of the world’s greatest fortunes werethe result of human disasters, both natural and manmade.ThreeBIBLIOGRAPHY299other books from the late sixties—George G.Kirstein’s The Rich:Are They Different? , Roy Perrott’s The Aristocrats, and Stephen Birmingham’s The Right People—also peeked inside the world ofthe rich, the unusual attention being paid to them no doubt aresponse to the changing winds of society.Still, despite all thesebooks, the nation’s bicentennial American wealth culture remainedlargely a mystery to the man or woman on the street.‘‘The rich arethe least studied—and least understood—class in the U.S.,’’ arguedNewsweek reporter Kenneth L.Woodward in 1974: ‘‘While sociolo-gists probe the poor and measure the middle classes with compu-terized efficiency, the rich remain largely ignored by socialscientists and journalists alike [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • blondiii.htw.pl
  •