[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.As a baseline, if we take human rights and democracy seriously, a de-cision to alter a fundamental characteristic of humans should not be takenby any individual or corporation without wide discussion among all mem- The Endangered Human 45bers of the affected population.As I concluded in the previous chapter, noindividual scientist or corporation has the moral warrant to redesignhumans (any more than any individual scientist or corporation has the moralwarrant to design a new, lethal virus or bacteria that could kill large num-bers of humans).Species-endangering experiments directly concern all hu-mans and should only be authorized democratically by a body that isrepresentative of everyone on the planet.These are the most important de-cisions we will ever make.The widespread condemnation of human replica-tive cloning by governments around the world provides a perhaps uniqueopportunity for the world to begin to work together to take some controlover biotechnology that threatens our very existence.The environmental movement has adopted the precautionary prin-ciple to help stem the tide of environmental alterations that are detrimen-tal to humans.One version of this principle holds that  when an activityraises threats of harm to human health or the environment.the propo-nent of that activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof[that the activity is more likely to be beneficial than harmful]. 4 The mosteffective way to shift the burden of proof is to outlaw dangerous and po-tentially lethal activities, thus requiring the proponents engaging in themto change the law before proceeding.This can be done nation-by-nation,but can only be made effective (because scientists and laboratories can movefrom country to country) by an internationally enforceable ban.The ac-tual text of a treaty banning human replicative cloning and inheritablemodifications is and will continue to be the subject of international debate.Following a national conference, Beyond Cloning, held at Boston Univer-sity in September 2001 (two weeeks after 9/11), Lori Andrews and I sug-gested the following language (obviously subject to negotiation and addeddetails) as a basis for going forward [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • blondiii.htw.pl
  •